From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Windsor Metal Fabrications, Ltd. v. Reynolds Metal Development, Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 1999
262 A.D.2d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted April 29, 1999

June 7, 1999

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and to foreclose a mechanic's lien, the plaintiff, Windsor Metal Fabrications, Ltd., appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), dated May 11, 1998, as granted that branch of the defendants' cross motion which was to dismiss the plaintiff's second cause of action to foreclose a mechanic's lien.

Sol Kodsi, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Since the construction drawings on which the plaintiff's mechanic's lien is based were not prepared by an architect, engineer, or surveyor, as required under Lien Law § 2 (4), the Supreme Court properly dismissed the second cause of action, which sought foreclosure of the lien ( cf., Matter of Di-Com Corp v. Active Fire Sprinkler Corp., 36 A.D.2d 20, 21).


Summaries of

Windsor Metal Fabrications, Ltd. v. Reynolds Metal Development, Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 1999
262 A.D.2d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Windsor Metal Fabrications, Ltd. v. Reynolds Metal Development, Co.

Case Details

Full title:WINDSOR METAL FABRICATIONS, LTD., appellant, v. REYNOLDS METAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 7, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
689 N.Y.S.2d 658

Citing Cases

SMC Elec. Contrs., Corp. v. TSSCO, Inc., 2009 NY Slip Op 51845(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 8/10/2009)

See Di-Com Corp. v. Active Fire Sprinkler Corp., 36 AD2d 20, 21 (1st Dep't 1971) (holding that whether the…

SMC ELEC. CONTRS., CORP. v. TSSCO, INC.

See Di-Com Corp. v. Active Fire Sprinkler Corp., 36 AD2d 20, 21 (1st Dep't 1971) (holding that whether the…