From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Windom v. Dodge Logging

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 7, 1996
910 P.2d 1175 (Or. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

WCB 93-05126; CA A85288

Submitted on record and briefs January 17, 1996.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration February 7, 1996.

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

Floyd H. Shebley filed the brief for petitioner. Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Julene M. Quinn, Special Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondents.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Haselton, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.


Petitioner argues that the Workers' Compensation Board erred in holding that he was ineligible for vocational assistance because his claim was in "own motion" status. The statute pertinent to his petition, ORS 656.278, has been amended by Oregon Laws 1995, chapter 332. Because the amended version of the statute is applicable, we reverse and remand for reconsideration in the light of the new law. Volk v. America West Airlines, 135 Or. App. 565, 899 P.2d 746 (1995).

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.


Summaries of

Windom v. Dodge Logging

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 7, 1996
910 P.2d 1175 (Or. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Windom v. Dodge Logging

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of Walter C. Windom, Claimant. Walter C…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 7, 1996

Citations

910 P.2d 1175 (Or. Ct. App. 1996)
910 P.2d 1175

Citing Cases

Saif v. Elizondo

PER CURIAM Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. Windom v. Dodge Logging, 139 Or. App. 130, 910 P.2d…