From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winding v. LandSafe Default, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 11, 2016
No. 2:15-cv-1974 KJM AC (PS) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2016)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-1974 KJM AC (PS)

04-11-2016

JACOB WINDING, Plaintiff, v. LANDSAFE DEFAULT, INC., et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On February 24, 2016, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 56. Plaintiff has not responded to the court's order, nor taken any action to prosecute this case.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court's orders. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. R. 110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one (21) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Local Rule 304(d). Plaintiff is advised that failure to file //// objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: April 11, 2016

/s/_________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Winding v. LandSafe Default, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 11, 2016
No. 2:15-cv-1974 KJM AC (PS) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2016)
Case details for

Winding v. LandSafe Default, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JACOB WINDING, Plaintiff, v. LANDSAFE DEFAULT, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 11, 2016

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-1974 KJM AC (PS) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2016)