From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Windham v. Borden

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Mar 3, 2010
EDCV 07-0779-RSWL (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2010)

Opinion


CHARLES WINDHAM, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW BORDEN, et al., Defendants. No. EDCV 07-0779-RSWL (JEM). United States District Court, C.D. California. March 3, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          RONALD S.W. LEW, Senior District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the Court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which plaintiff has objected. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that summary adjudication is granted as to plaintiff's state law tort claims and federal claims for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs under the Eighth Amendment and retaliation under the First Amendment. Summary adjudication is denied as to plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment excessive force and failure to protect claims.


Summaries of

Windham v. Borden

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Mar 3, 2010
EDCV 07-0779-RSWL (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2010)
Case details for

Windham v. Borden

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES WINDHAM, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW BORDEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Mar 3, 2010

Citations

EDCV 07-0779-RSWL (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2010)