From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Trott Law, P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 7, 2015
Case Number 15-10747 (E.D. Mich. May. 7, 2015)

Opinion

Case Number 15-10747

05-07-2015

EARL D. WILSON, Plaintiff, v. TROTT LAW, P.C., Defendant.


CORRECTED ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION , DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO ADJOURN CLASS CERTIFICATION HEARING, PERMITTING LIMITED DISCOVERY, AND SCHEDULING DATES

On April 29, 2015, the Court entered an order denying without prejudice the plaintiff's motion for class certification, denying as moot motion to adjourn class certification hearing, permitting limited discovery, and scheduling dates. Counsel for the defendant filed a motion on May 4, 2015 identifying a discrepancy in the Court's order permitting limited discovery. The Court has determined that its order was in error and therefore enters this corrected order clarifying that the plaintiff may conduct limited discovery to respond to the defendant's motion for summary judgment.

Presently before the Court is the plaintiff's motion for class certification. The Court held a case management conference on April 29, 2015. At the case management conference, the plaintiff asked the Court to adjourn the hearing on the plaintiff's motion for class certification and to permit the parties to conduct limited discovery before responding to the defendant's motion for summary judgment. The defendant consented to the plaintiff's requests at the case management conference.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the parties may conduct limited discovery for purposes of responding to the defendant's motion for summary judgment. The parties must complete discovery on or before May 22, 2015.

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff shall respond to the defendant's motion for summary judgment on or before June 1, 2015.

It is further ORDERED that a hearing on the defendant's motion for summary judgment is scheduled for June 24, 2015 at 3:30 p.m.

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion for class certification [dkt. #3] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See Sivak v. United Parcel Service Company, No. 13-15263 (Jan. 21, 2014) (denying as premature motion for class certification).

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion to adjourn the hearing on his motion for class certification [dkt. #15] is DENIED as moot.

It is further ORDERED that the case management and scheduling conference is ADJOURNED without date.

It is further ORDERED that the defendant's objection to order and motion to amend [dkt. #23] is DENIED as moot.

s/David M. Lawson

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge
Dated: May 7, 2015

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on May 7, 2015.

/s Susan Pinkowski

SUSAN PINKOWSKI


Summaries of

Wilson v. Trott Law, P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 7, 2015
Case Number 15-10747 (E.D. Mich. May. 7, 2015)
Case details for

Wilson v. Trott Law, P.C.

Case Details

Full title:EARL D. WILSON, Plaintiff, v. TROTT LAW, P.C., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 7, 2015

Citations

Case Number 15-10747 (E.D. Mich. May. 7, 2015)