Wilson v. State

Full title: Ronel Orlando WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Apr 25, 2012

86 So. 3d 1158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 4D10–3034.

2012-04-25

Ronel Orlando WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Thomas M. Lynch, IV, Judge; L.T. Case No. 09–6103CF10A. Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Karen E. Ehrlich, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melanie Dale Surber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Thomas M. Lynch, IV, Judge; L.T. Case No. 09–6103CF10A.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Karen E. Ehrlich, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melanie Dale Surber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Scott v. State, 66 So.3d 923, 930 (Fla.2011) (“[U]nder the ‘invited response’ doctrine, the State is permitted to emphasize uncontradicted evidence for the narrow purpose of rebutting a defense argument since the defense has invited the response.”) (citation and other internal quotations omitted).

TAYLOR, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.