From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Mar 9, 2010
330 S.W.3d 499 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. ED92792.

March 9, 2010.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, 0822-CC01620, Robert H. Dierker, Jr., Judge.

Alexandra Johnson, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Jamie Pamela Rasmussen, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Prior report: 243 S.W.3d 546.


ORDER


Terry L. Wilson (Movant) appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment (Judgment) denying his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct the Judgment or Sentence, filed pursuant to Rule 29.15, on his conviction of first-degree tampering.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The Judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2); Rule 29.15(k). No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Wilson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Mar 9, 2010
330 S.W.3d 499 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Wilson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Terry L. WILSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Mar 9, 2010

Citations

330 S.W.3d 499 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)