From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Plummer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Feb 14, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-337 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 14, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cv-337

02-14-2013

ANTHONY L. WILSON, Plaintiff, v. PHIL PLUMMER, et al., Defendants.


District Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman


ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon Defendants' motion (doc. 16) to exempt them from the Court's February 8, 2013 Order (doc. 15). For good cause shown, the motion (doc. 16) is GRANTED. As pro se Plaintiff is presently incarcerated, the parties are not required to make Initial Disclosures as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a), nor to meet and confer pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B)(iv). Nonetheless, Plaintiff and Defendants shall file a memorandum by March 7, 2013 providing their proposed dates for the case Scheduling Order, as set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b).

The preliminary pretrial conference will proceed as scheduled on March 14, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. The Court will initiate the telephone call to counsel for Defendants and pro se Plaintiff.

As pro se Plaintiff does not have access to electronic filing, the Court shall mail a copy of this Order to him at the address listed on the docket sheet.

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Wilson v. Plummer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Feb 14, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-337 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Wilson v. Plummer

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY L. WILSON, Plaintiff, v. PHIL PLUMMER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Feb 14, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cv-337 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 14, 2013)