From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Plummer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 11, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-337 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cv-337

04-11-2013

ANTHONY L. WILSON, Plaintiff, v. PHIL PLUMMER, et al., Defendants.


District Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman


ORDER

This is a pro se civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 10, 2013, the Court held a Preliminary Pretrial Conference, by telephone, with pro se Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants. The Court then discussed with the parties their two proposed calendars. See docs. 20, 21. Having considered their respective positions, their written submissions, and noting Defendants' pending motion to dismiss, the Court ORDERS as follows: (1) As previously directed, see doc. 27, pro se Plaintiff's memorandum in opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss shall be filed on or before April 29, 2013; (2) Discovery in this matter is STAYED until the Court rules on Defendants' motion to dismiss; and (3) the Court will issue a calendar in this case, if appropriate, following its ruling on Defendants' dismissal motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Wilson v. Plummer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 11, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-337 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Wilson v. Plummer

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY L. WILSON, Plaintiff, v. PHIL PLUMMER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Apr 11, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cv-337 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 11, 2013)