From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. TDCJ Pers.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Jul 28, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:17-CV-28 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 28, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:17-CV-28

07-28-2017

SONNY WILSON v. TDCJ PERSONNEL, ET AL.


ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Sonny Wilson, a prisoner confined at the Polunsky Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Samuel Bradshaw. Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee or request leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

The Court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge recommends denying plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and dismissing the action unless plaintiff paid the $400 filing fee within fourteen days after the Report and Recommendation was entered.

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and the pleadings. Plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). After careful consideration, the Court concludes the objections are without merit. Plaintiff asserts that he is not seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff alleges that he intends to pay the filing fee, but needs instructions about how to pay it. The Court notes that in Civil Action Number 1:16-CV-106, plaintiff received written instructions about paying the filing fee, and he successfully paid the fee in that case. Therefore, his objection that he needs payment instructions in this case lacks merit. Plaintiff has had sufficient time to pay the filing fee during the five months this action has been pending, but he has not paid the $400 filing fee. Therefore, the action should be dismissed without prejudice.

ORDER

Accordingly, plaintiff's objections (document no. 4) are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge (document no. 3) is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendations.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 28 day of July, 2017.

/s/_________

Ron Clark, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wilson v. TDCJ Pers.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Jul 28, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:17-CV-28 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 28, 2017)
Case details for

Wilson v. TDCJ Pers.

Case Details

Full title:SONNY WILSON v. TDCJ PERSONNEL, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 28, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:17-CV-28 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 28, 2017)