From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Parole Officer Brock

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 11, 2008
9:06-CV-528 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 11, 2008)

Summary

holding that "participation in a [parole-mandated] drug/alcohol rehabilitation center . . . is not the type of 'deeply personal' information that is protected by the Fourteenth Amendment"

Summary of this case from Schlosser v. Kwak

Opinion

9:06-CV-528.

September 11, 2008

ANDRE WILSON, 01-B-0799, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Comstock, N.Y., Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Despite the incorrect address noted on the Docket, an inmate search on the New York State Department of Correctional Services website revealed Plaintiff's current location at Great Meadow Correctional Facility. Information available at http://www.docs.state.ny.us. Plaintiff is reminded of his ongoing obligation to keep the Court and his adversaries apprised of his current address. N.D.N.Y.L.R. (10c)(2)

STEPHEN M. KERWIN, ESQ., Assistant Attorney General, HON. ANDREW M. CUOMO, Attorney General for the State of New York, The Capitol, Albany, N.Y., Attorney for Defendants.


ORDER


The above matter comes to me following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece, duly filed on the 21st day of August 2008. Following ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent me the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.

After careful review of all of the papers herein, including the Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, and no objections submitted thereto, it is

ORDERED, that:

1. The Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety.

2. The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 17) is granted, and that Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is dismissed.

3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon all parties and the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Parole Officer Brock

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 11, 2008
9:06-CV-528 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 11, 2008)

holding that "participation in a [parole-mandated] drug/alcohol rehabilitation center . . . is not the type of 'deeply personal' information that is protected by the Fourteenth Amendment"

Summary of this case from Schlosser v. Kwak
Case details for

Wilson v. Parole Officer Brock

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE WILSON, Plaintiff, v. PAROLE OFFICER BROCK; NEW YORK STATE DIVISION…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Sep 11, 2008

Citations

9:06-CV-528 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 11, 2008)

Citing Cases

Schlosser v. Kwak

At least one district court in this circuit has concluded that participation in a drug or alcohol…

Myers v. Dolac

On the other hand, courts have declined to recognize constitutional protection for many other medical…