From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Montgomery County Jail

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Mar 1, 2010
Case No. 3:10-cv-54 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 1, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 3:10-cv-54.

March 1, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #4), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Complaint herein insofar as it seeks money damages against Judge Huffman individually, is DISMISSED with prejudice as barred by judicial immunity; Insofar as it seeks money damages against Judge Huffman in her official capacity, is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the Eleventh Amendment; and Insofar as it seeks injunctive and declaratory relief, is DISMISSED without prejudice as barred by the abstention doctrine of Younger v. Harris, supra.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Montgomery County Jail

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Mar 1, 2010
Case No. 3:10-cv-54 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Wilson v. Montgomery County Jail

Case Details

Full title:Richard Wilson, Plaintiff, v. Warden, Montgomery County Jail Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Mar 1, 2010

Citations

Case No. 3:10-cv-54 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 1, 2010)

Citing Cases

Hobbs v. Faulkner

In addition, "opinions formed by the judge on the basis of facts introduced or events occurring in the course…

Barrett v. Marbley

" "[O]pinions formed by the judge on the basis of facts introduced or events occurring in the course of the…