From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 27, 1938
168 Misc. 125 (N.Y. App. Term 1938)

Opinion

May 27, 1938.

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, County of New York.

Tanner, Sillcocks Friend [ William B. Moore and John A. Meyer of counsel], for the appellant.

George E. Wanderman [ Philip Gelfand of counsel], for the respondent.



The trial judge erred in submitting to the jury for its decision the question whether the representation relied upon by defendant was material. The representation, if the insured had been a patient at the New York Hospital, was as matter of law material. ( Geer v. Union Mutual Life Ins. Co., 273 N.Y. 261.)

Judgment, so far as appealed from, reversed and a new trial ordered, limited to the issue whether the assured was the Walter Wilson that had been treated at the New York Hospital as claimed in the defense.

Order affirmed.

All concur. Present — LYDON, FRANKENTHALER and NOONAN, JJ.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 27, 1938
168 Misc. 125 (N.Y. App. Term 1938)
Case details for

Wilson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:ORIELEE WILSON, Also Known as ORIA L. WILSON, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: May 27, 1938

Citations

168 Misc. 125 (N.Y. App. Term 1938)
5 N.Y.S.2d 310

Citing Cases

Matter of Jennings

Where persons in forma pauperis are authorized to initiate proceedings the statute protects them from the…

Marine Midland v. Labour

Therefore, defendants' application to defend as poor persons is granted, and the plaintiff, though successful…