From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Marshall

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 9, 2010
CV 06-1616-MMM (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2010)

Opinion


LARRY WILSON, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, WARDEN, Respondent. No. CV 06-1616-MMM (MAN). United States District Court, C.D. California. August 9, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"). The time for filing Objections to the Report has passed, and no Objections have been filed with the Court. The Court accepts and adopts the Report and the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations therein.

         IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on the parties.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Marshall

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 9, 2010
CV 06-1616-MMM (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2010)
Case details for

Wilson v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:LARRY WILSON, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Aug 9, 2010

Citations

CV 06-1616-MMM (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2010)