From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Marcus

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 13, 2012
100 A.D.3d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-13

In re Jeffrey WILSON, Petitioner, v. Hon. Martin MARCUS, etc., et al., Respondents.

Jeffrey Wilson, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Andrew H. Meier of counsel), for Hon. Martin Marcus, respondent.


Jeffrey Wilson, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Andrew H. Meier of counsel), for Hon. Martin Marcus, respondent.
Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Jason S. Whitehead of counsel), for Newton Mendys, respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

TOM, J.P., ANDRIAS, DeGRASSE, RICHTER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Marcus

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 13, 2012
100 A.D.3d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Wilson v. Marcus

Case Details

Full title:In re Jeffrey WILSON, Petitioner, v. Hon. Martin MARCUS, etc., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 13, 2012

Citations

100 A.D.3d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7595
953 N.Y.S.2d 507