From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 20, 2010
2010 Ohio 4990 (Ohio 2010)

Opinion

No. 2010-1054.

Submitted October 13, 2010.

Decided October 20, 2010.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Pickaway County, No. 10CA13.

Lawrence E. Wilson, pro se.

Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Thelma Thomas Price, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Lawrence E. Wilson, for a writ of habeas corpus. As the court of appeals properly held, habeas corpus is not available to raise Wilson's various claims. See Shroyer v. Banks, 123 Ohio St.3d 88, 2009-Ohio-4080, 914 N.E.2d 368, ¶ 1 (validity of charging instrument and ineffective assistance of counsel); Durain v. Sheldon, 122 Ohio St.3d 582, 2009-Ohio-4082, 913 N.E.2d 442, ¶ 1 (sentencing entry violating Crim. R. 32); Cammon v. Brigano, 101 Ohio St.3d 133, 2004-Ohio-316, 802 N.E.2d 656, ¶ 3-4 (improper jury instructions and erroneous admission of "other acts" evidence); Tucker v. Collins (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 77, 78, 591 N.E.2d 1241 (invalid waiver of counsel); Junius v. Eberlin, 122 Ohio St.3d 53, 2009-Ohio-2383, 907 N.E.2d 1179, ¶ 1 (actual innocence); State ex rel. Jaffal v. Calabrese, 105 Ohio St.3d 440, 2005-Ohio-2591, 828 N.E.2d 107, ¶ 5 (sentencing errors); Bussey v. Maxwell (1965), 2 Ohio St.2d 143, 144, 31 O.O.2d 236, 207 N.E.2d 244 (denial of right to fair trial); Tucker v. McAninch (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 423, 696 N.E.2d 595 (due process); Norris v. Wilson, Richland App. No. 04 CA 33, 2005-Ohio-4594 (violation of Crim. R. 43(A)). We deny appellant's motion to correct the case caption on his notice of appeal and merit brief.

Judgment affirmed.

BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 20, 2010
2010 Ohio 4990 (Ohio 2010)
Case details for

Wilson v. Hudson

Case Details

Full title:Wilson, Appellant, v. Hudson, Warden, Appellee

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 20, 2010

Citations

2010 Ohio 4990 (Ohio 2010)
127 Ohio St. 3d 31
936 N.E.2d 42

Citing Cases

Kneuss v. Sloan

However, we have repeatedly held that Sixth Amendment ineffective-assistance claims are not cognizable in…

Curtis v. Wainwright

An alleged violation of Crim.R. 43(A) is not cognizable in habeas corpus. Wilson v. Hudson , 127 Ohio St.3d…