From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WILSON v. HECK

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Mar 30, 2009
Case No. 3:09-cv-94 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 30, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09-cv-94.

March 30, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #3), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition is DISMISSED without prejudice.


Summaries of

WILSON v. HECK

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Mar 30, 2009
Case No. 3:09-cv-94 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 30, 2009)
Case details for

WILSON v. HECK

Case Details

Full title:Richard Wilson, Petitioner, v. Matthew Heck, et al. Respondents

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Mar 30, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:09-cv-94 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 30, 2009)