From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Greenville Cnty. Sheriff's Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION
Jan 30, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14-4553-MGL-KFM (D.S.C. Jan. 30, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14-4553-MGL-KFM

01-30-2015

ALLEN RAY WILSON, Plaintiff, v. GREENVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; OFFICER BREWER, Sheriff's Deputy; and JOHN CRANGLE, 13th Circuit Public Defenders Office, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING THE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT SERVICE OF PROCESS

This case was filed as a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) of the United States Magistrate Judge suggesting that the action be dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. The Report was made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina.

The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with the Court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270 (1976). The Court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report to which specific objection is made, and the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

The Magistrate Judge filed the Report on December 4, 2014, but Plaintiff failed to file any objections. "[I]n the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must 'only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.'" Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee's note). Moreover, a failure to object waives appellate review. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985).

After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case pursuant to the standard set forth above, the Court adopts the Report and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment of this Court that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and without issuance and service of process.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed this 30th day of January, 2015, in Spartanburg, South Carolina.

s/ Mary G. Lewis

MARY G. LEWIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

Plaintiff is hereby notified of the right to appeal this Order within thirty days from the date hereof, pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Greenville Cnty. Sheriff's Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION
Jan 30, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14-4553-MGL-KFM (D.S.C. Jan. 30, 2015)
Case details for

Wilson v. Greenville Cnty. Sheriff's Office

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN RAY WILSON, Plaintiff, v. GREENVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 30, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14-4553-MGL-KFM (D.S.C. Jan. 30, 2015)