Opinion
Case No. 2:13-cv-139
02-20-2015
ANTHONY L. WILSON, Plaintiff, v. JILL GILLESPIE, et al., Defendants.
Magistrate Judge Kemp
OPINION AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge's January 22, 2015 Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (ECF No. 61). In that filing, the Magistrate Judge considered Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings and recommended that the Court grant the same.
The R&R advised the parties that, if any party sought review by the District Judge, that party may file objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 61, at PAGEID # 679.) The R&R further advised the parties that their failure to object within fourteen days would "result in a waiver of the right to have the district judge review the [R&R] de novo, and also operates as a waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the [R&R]." (Id. (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir.1981)).)
The Court has reviewed the R&R. Noting that no objections have been filed, that the time for filing such objections has expired, and that the Magistrate Judge's reasoning is correct, the Court ADOPTS the R&R (ECF No. 61) and GRANTS Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings (ECF No. 35). The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly and terminate this case on the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Gregory L. Frost
GREGORY L. FROST
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE