From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 25, 2010
CASE NO. 5:09CV130 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 25, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:09CV130.

January 25, 2010


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


This matter is an action to review a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff's ("Wilson") application for period of disability and disability insurance benefits under 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423. On January, 21, 2009, pursuant to L.R. 72.2, this matter was automatically referred to Magistrate Judge Greg White for preparation of a report and recommendation ("R R"). (Dkt. # 5).

On January 7, 2010, Magistrate Judge White issued the R R, recommending that this Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. (Dkt. # 19). FED. R. CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within ten (14) days after service. Wilson has failed to file any such objections.

Therefore, any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court's limited resources.Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

Thus, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge White is hereby ADOPTED. (Dkt. # 19). Accordingly, this matter is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 25, 2010
CASE NO. 5:09CV130 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 25, 2010)
Case details for

Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL R. WILSON, PLAINTIFF, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jan 25, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 5:09CV130 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 25, 2010)

Citing Cases

Saulic v. Colvin

Vocational experts routinely testify that such absenteeism would be unacceptable to employers and result in…

Chhay v. Colvin

Vocational experts routinely testify that such absenteeism would be unacceptable to employers and result in…