From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. CMC Home Lending

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Dec 15, 2015
CASE NO. 4:15-CV-304 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 15, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:15-CV-304

12-15-2015

JAMES WILSON v. CMC HOME LENDING and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.


(Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On October 15, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered (Dkt. #17) containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #10) be granted. Moreover, on that same date, the Magistrate Judge also entered a Notice of Impending Dismissal (Dkt. #16), notifying Plaintiff that this action shall be dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining Defendant CMC Home Lending, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The Court further notified Plaintiff that failure to respond would result in dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute.

Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge regarding Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #10), and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. The Court finds that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. should be dismissed. Further, having received no response to the Court's notice of impending dismissal (Dkt. #16), the Court further finds Defendant CMC Home Lending should also be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #10) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. are DISMISSED with prejudice.

If is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant CMC Home Lending are DISMISSED without prejudice.

All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 15th day of December, 2015.

/s/_________

AMOS L. MAZZANT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wilson v. CMC Home Lending

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Dec 15, 2015
CASE NO. 4:15-CV-304 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 15, 2015)
Case details for

Wilson v. CMC Home Lending

Case Details

Full title:JAMES WILSON v. CMC HOME LENDING and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

Court:United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 15, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. 4:15-CV-304 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 15, 2015)