From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 6, 2010
03 Civ. 2495 (CM) (FM) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 6, 2010)

Opinion

03 Civ. 2495 (CM) (FM).

July 6, 2010


ORDER


It having been reported to this Court that the above entitled action has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that the action be, and the same hereby is, discontinued with prejudice but without costs; provided, however, that if the settlement is not consummated within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, either party may apply by letter for restoration of the action to the calendar of the undersigned. Any such application must be made before the thirty (30) days have expired, or it will be denied. Any such application timely made will be granted.


Summaries of

Wilson v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 6, 2010
03 Civ. 2495 (CM) (FM) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Wilson v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:Omar Wilson, Plaintiff(s), v. The City of New York, et. al., Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 6, 2010

Citations

03 Civ. 2495 (CM) (FM) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 6, 2010)