Summary
finding that the plaintiff's reference to “Bills of Exchange Act 1882” did not provide a federal cause of action
Summary of this case from Evans-Williams v. Sunstates Mgmt. Corp.Opinion
C. A. 3:23-cv-05348-SAL
04-02-2024
Olivia Wilson, Plaintiff, v. Aqua Finance, Defendant.
ORDER
SHERRI A. LYDON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter is before the court for review of the October 26, 2023, Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2) (D.S.C.). [ECF No. 8.] In the Report, the magistrate judge recommends the court summarily dismiss this case as frivolous and with prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Attached to the Report was a notice advising Wilson of the procedures and requirements for filing objections to the Report and the serious consequences if she failed to do so. Id. at 13. Wilson has not filed objections, and the time for doing so has expired.
The magistrate judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility to make a final determination remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of only those portions of the Report that have been specifically objected to, and the court may accept, reject, or modify the Report, in whole or in part. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In the absence of objections, the court is not required to provide an explanation for adopting the Report and must “only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4thCir. 2005) (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 72 advisory committee's note).
Having thoroughly reviewed the Report, the applicable law, and the record of this case in accordance with the above standard, the court finds no clear error, adopts the Report, ECF No. 8, and incorporates the Report by reference herein. This case is thus DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS AND WITH PREJUDICE and WITHOUT ISSUANCE AND SERVICE OF PROCESS.
IT IS SO ORDERED.