From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilridge v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Jun 8, 2022
No. 1D21-3460 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 8, 2022)

Opinion

1D21-3460

06-08-2022

Eric L. Wilridge, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Eric L. Wilridge, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus-Original Jurisdiction.

Eric L. Wilridge, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam

Because the trial court has ruled on the pleading pending below, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Ward v. State, 770 So.2d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (denying a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the pleading pending below). A copy of the trial court's order is attached to Petitioner's copy of this order.

Osterhaus, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wilridge v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Jun 8, 2022
No. 1D21-3460 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Wilridge v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eric L. Wilridge, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Jun 8, 2022

Citations

No. 1D21-3460 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 8, 2022)