Opinion
Civil Action 3:21-CV-00054-RP
08-31-2021
ORDER
ROY PERCY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
This matter comes before the Court upon pro se motions [29], [30] filed by Plaintiff. In his first motion [29], Plaintiff moves for reconsideration of the Court's order dismissing as moot Plaintiff's motion and reopening this case. In so moving, Plaintiff seems to misunderstand the Court's previous order, which dismissed as moot another of Plaintiff's motions only because the Court had already granted the relief requested, i.e. reopening the instant case. Consequently, there is no basis for reconsideration, and the instant motion [29] will be DENIED as moot.
Plaintiff styles his second motion [30] as a “Motion for Submit Additional Information to the Court.” This particular filing, however, is simply a response to the Court's previous order directing Plaintiff to submit additional information. As such, that motion [30] will be TERMINATED as moot.
SO ORDERED.