From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 16, 2005
913 So. 2d 1259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 4D04-1420.

November 16, 2005.

Appeal from the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County, Sheldon Schapiro, J.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We reverse appellant's habitual offender sentence, because the state did not offer into evidence any proof of appellant's prior convictions or of the date of his release, evidence essential to the imposition of habitual offender status. See Osborne v. State, 820 So.2d 1046 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). We reject the state's argument that this issue was not preserved on appeal. The issue was raised in a motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2), just as it was in Osborne. Id. On remand the trial court may again consider whether the habitual offender sentence should be applied to appellant. Id.

We affirm as to the remaining issues raised.

GUNTHER, WARNER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Willis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 16, 2005
913 So. 2d 1259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Willis v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tommy WILLIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 16, 2005

Citations

913 So. 2d 1259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)