From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willingham v. King Co. Cor. Faci. Mental Health Dept

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
May 19, 2008
CASE NO. C08-60-RAJ-JPD (W.D. Wash. May. 19, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. C08-60-RAJ-JPD.

May 19, 2008


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This is a civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff Remington Willingham filed this action in January 2008 while he was incarcerated at the King County Correctional Facility in Seattle, Washington. On February 25, 2008, the Court issued orders granting plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and directing that plaintiff's complaint be served on defendant. Defendant was served on February 27, 2008. On March 10, 2008, copies of the February 25 orders, which were mailed to plaintiff at the King County Correctional Facility, were returned by the post office with a notation indicating that plaintiff was no longer at the facility.

On March 14, 2008, defendant filed a notice of appearance. And, on March 21, 2008, defendant filed an answer to the complaint and a motion to dismiss this action. Defendant argues in its motion to dismiss that this action should be dismissed pursuant to Local Rule CR 41(b)(2) because plaintiff has failed to keep the court and opposing parties advised as to his current address.

Over sixty days have passed since mail directed to plaintiff at his address of record was returned by the post office and plaintiff has not notified the court of his current address. Accordingly, defendant's motion to dismiss should be granted and this action should be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute pursuant to Local Rule CR 41(b)(2). A proposed order accompanies this Report and Recommendation.


Summaries of

Willingham v. King Co. Cor. Faci. Mental Health Dept

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
May 19, 2008
CASE NO. C08-60-RAJ-JPD (W.D. Wash. May. 19, 2008)
Case details for

Willingham v. King Co. Cor. Faci. Mental Health Dept

Case Details

Full title:REMINGTON D. WILLINGHAM, a/k/a REMI LeBOE Plaintiff, v. KING COUNTY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle

Date published: May 19, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. C08-60-RAJ-JPD (W.D. Wash. May. 19, 2008)

Citing Cases

Valdez v. State Road Department

"In consideration of the premium at which such insurance may be written, it shall be a part of any insurance…

Kenyon v. Saunders

A convict is neither civilly dead, nor deprived of his rights of property; and, if this be so, he should be…