From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willingham v. County of San Mateo

United States District Court, N.D. California
Mar 13, 2005
No. C-04-4592 MMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2005)

Opinion

No. C-04-4592 MMC.

March 13, 2005


ORDER RE: LETTER FROM PLAINTIFF DARRYL WILLINGHAM


The Court is in receipt of a letter, dated February 24, 2006, written to the Court by plaintiff Darryl Willingham.

Plaintiff is represented by counsel in the instant matter, and, consequently, any communication plaintiff seeks with the Court must be made through his counsel of record. Further, the Court cannot engage in an ex parte communication with a party, whether represented by counsel or not. See Civil L.R. 11-4(c).

By order filed November 7, 2005, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of the remaining defendant as to all remaining claims in the instant matter.

Accordingly, the Court will take no action on said filing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Willingham v. County of San Mateo

United States District Court, N.D. California
Mar 13, 2005
No. C-04-4592 MMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2005)
Case details for

Willingham v. County of San Mateo

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL WILLINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Mar 13, 2005

Citations

No. C-04-4592 MMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2005)