Opinion
No. 68215
07-23-2015
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is a pro se petition for a writ of extraordinary relief. Petitioner seeks a hearing on whether the district court and the Nye County District Attorney's Office are subject to sanctions for having ignored petitioner's "warning" that the Nevada Revised Statutes are invalid because a joint resolution of the Legislature lacks an enacting clause. We decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228-29, 88 P. 3d 840, 844 (2004). To the extent petitioner challenges the validity of his judgment of conviction, such claims must be raised in a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance. NRS 34.724(2)(b); NRS 34.738(1). Accordingly, we
We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34. --------
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, J.
Saitta
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Pickering
cc: Hon. Robert W. Lane, District Judge
Nye County District Attorney
Nicholas James Willing
Attorney General/Carson City
Nye County Clerk