From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willig v. Bamvakais

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Mar 13, 2001
39 S.W.3d 539 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 58671

March 13, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAFAYETTE COUNTY, THE HONORABLE JOHN FRERKING, JUDGE.

James R. Anderson, Kansas City, MO, counsel for appellant.

James D. Worthington, Lexington, MO, counsel for respondent.

Before Robert G. Ulrich, P.J., Edwin H. Smith and Thomas H. Newton, JJ.


ORDER


On December 4, 1998, appellant Dana Bamvakais made, executed and delivered to C. Edward Willig her written promissory note in the principal sum of $13,500. She received a check from Willig in the sum of $13,500. The note on its face shows that the payee of the note was "CEW Enterprises." Appellant made three partial payments to Willig, payable to CEW Enterprises. Appellant failed to keep note payments current, and the note came into default. Respondent made demand for payment of the note, and thereafter filed suit in his own name doing business as CEW Enterprises. The claim was based on a written promissory note.

Appellant filed a counterclaim alleging fraud and specifically that Willig had made a promise to provide a parking lot adjacent to a mutual business building and that she relied to her detriment in leasing space in that business building.

After depositions were taken of both Appellant and Respondent, Respondent sought summary judgment on both the promissory note and on the counterclaim. The circuit court entered summary judgment on both counts in favor of Respondent.

For the reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the trial court's decision. Rule 84.16(b).

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Willig v. Bamvakais

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Mar 13, 2001
39 S.W.3d 539 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Willig v. Bamvakais

Case Details

Full title:C. EDWARD WILLIG d/b/a CEW ENTERPRISES, Respondent, v. DANA BAMVAKAIS…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Mar 13, 2001

Citations

39 S.W.3d 539 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)