From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ethridge v. Morgan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Jul 1, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0486 SECTION P (W.D. La. Jul. 1, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0486 SECTION P

07-01-2015

WILLIE EARL ETHRIDGE LA. DOC #461463 v. WARDEN MORGAN


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and considering the objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because petitioner's claims are barred by the one-year limitation period codified at 28 U.S.C. §2244(d).

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 1st day of July, 2015.

/s/ _________

ROBERT G. JAMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ethridge v. Morgan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Jul 1, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0486 SECTION P (W.D. La. Jul. 1, 2015)
Case details for

Ethridge v. Morgan

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE EARL ETHRIDGE LA. DOC #461463 v. WARDEN MORGAN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Jul 1, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0486 SECTION P (W.D. La. Jul. 1, 2015)

Citing Cases

Stewart v. Stephens

This argument has been repeatedly rejected within the Fifth Circuit. Indeed, in a case "on all fours" with…

Brown v. Deville

The Supreme Court, in Martinez and Trevino, recognized that ineffective assistance of counsel at the…