From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williamson v. Chase

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Oct 25, 2010
Civil Action 2:10-CV-509 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 25, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:10-CV-509.

October 25, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff, who is proceeding without the assistance of counsel, initiated this action on June 4, 2010. Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Doc. No. 1. Plaintiff was expressly advised that Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that claims against any party not served with process within 120 days be dismissed. Order, Doc. No. 9. The Court ordered plaintiff to show cause, no later than October 18, 2010, why the case should not be dismissed for failure to timely effect service of process. Id.

There is no indication on the record that plaintiff has completed the paperwork necessary to effect service of process in this case. Over four months have passed since this case was initiated and service of process has not been completed. The Court therefore concludes that dismissal of the action, without prejudice, is appropriate.

This action is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, for failure to effect timely service of process.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter FINAL JUDGMENT in this case.

Date 10-25-2010


Summaries of

Williamson v. Chase

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Oct 25, 2010
Civil Action 2:10-CV-509 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 25, 2010)
Case details for

Williamson v. Chase

Case Details

Full title:DONALD V. WILLIAMSON, Plaintiff, v. JP MORGAN CHASE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Oct 25, 2010

Citations

Civil Action 2:10-CV-509 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 25, 2010)