From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Williams

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Nov 17, 1943
51 N.E.2d 784 (Ill. App. Ct. 1943)

Opinion

Gen. No. 42,240.

Opinion filed November 17, 1943.

JUDGMENTS, § 116when petition to vacate after term insufficient. Petition to vacate divorce decree failed to set forth grounds which would justify court in setting aside, in September of 1941, decree entered November 1940.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal by defendant from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. RUDOLPH F. DESORT, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the April term, 1942. Order affirmed. Opinion filed November 17, 1943.

ELLIS WESTBROOKS and JOSEPH J. ATTWELL, JR., of Chicago, for appellant; JOSEPH J. ATTWELL, JR., of Chicago, of counsel.

No appearance for appellee.


This is an appeal from an order dismissing defendant's petition to vacate a divorce decree. No brief was filed by plaintiff in this court.

The record discloses the decree was entered November 12, 1940 in favor of plaintiff, providing alimony and attorneys' fees for defendant in accordance with a stipulation entered into by the parties. Defendant's cross-complaint was, on motion of defendant's counsel, withdrawn. The decree discloses that Blaine G. Alston of the firm of Ellis Westbrooks represented defendant at the trial, and at his suggestion in open court, a provision of the stipulation was modified. The decree disposed of the questions of divorce, custody of the child of the parties, and defendant's alimony rights and attorneys' fees.

July 26, 1941, a petition was filed by defendant's sister and "Guardian," represented by Ellis West-brooks, seeking to vacate the decree on the ground that defendant was incompetent when the stipulation was signed and her condition known to plaintiff, but unknown to her attorneys; and the petition seeks a hearing on the merits, claiming financial provisions were inadequate; a modification of those provisions and attorneys' fees. Plaintiff moved to strike the petition on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction to vacate the decree "after term time." The trial court sustained the motion to dismiss.

No grounds are set forth in the petition to vacate which would justify the court in setting aside, in September of 1941, a decree entered in November, 1940. Sim v. Sim, 247 Ill. App. 321.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Order affirmed.

BURKE, J., concurs.

HEBEL, P.J., took no part.


Summaries of

Williams v. Williams

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Nov 17, 1943
51 N.E.2d 784 (Ill. App. Ct. 1943)
Case details for

Williams v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:Booker T. Williams, Appellee, v. Dorothy Williams, Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Nov 17, 1943

Citations

51 N.E.2d 784 (Ill. App. Ct. 1943)
51 N.E.2d 784