Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-cv-241 (WOB-KLL)
05-06-2015
LINDSEY WILLIAMS PETITIONER v. WARDEN, LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 18), and having considered de novo petitioner's objections (Doc. 20), respondent's response (Doc. 22), and petitioner's reply (Doc. 23), and the Court being sufficiently advised,
IT IS ORDERED that the objections (Doc. 20) to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18) be, and hereby are, overruled. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 18) be, and hereby is, adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. 8) is granted, and petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED with prejudice on the ground that the petition is time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). A certificate of appealability shall not issue with respect to any of the claims alleged herein. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a)(3), any appeal of this judgment would not be taken in "good faith."
This 6th day of May, 2015.
Signed By:
William O. Bertelsman
United States District Judge