From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 11, 2014
CASE NO. 2:14-CV-1461 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 11, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-1461

12-11-2014

LEE D. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.



MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEMP
OPINION AND ORDER

On October 3, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts recommending that this action be dismissed. (ECF Doc. 3). Despite being advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, and although the Court granted Petitioner's request for an extension of time to in which to file objections, no objections have been filed.

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ George C. Smith

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Williams v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 11, 2014
CASE NO. 2:14-CV-1461 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 11, 2014)
Case details for

Williams v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:LEE D. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 11, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-1461 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 11, 2014)