From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Villescaz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-1230 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-1230 CKD P

10-19-2015

LANCE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. T. VILLESCAZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 18) is denied. Dated: October 19, 2015

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1/mp
will1230.31


Summaries of

Williams v. Villescaz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-1230 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2015)
Case details for

Williams v. Villescaz

Case Details

Full title:LANCE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. T. VILLESCAZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 19, 2015

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-1230 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2015)