From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Unknown

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 8, 2022
2:19-cv-10502-GW (SK) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-cv-10502-GW (SK)

03-08-2022

ROBERT CURTIS WILLIAMS, III, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

GEORGE H. WU U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the attached Report and Recommendation to grant in part and deny in part Defendants' motion to dismiss. Neither Plaintiff nor Defendants filed any objections. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

THEREFORE, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as set forth in the Report and Recommendation. The remaining Defendant must file his answer to the surviving claims in the complaint, as described in the Report and Recommendation, within 14 days of this order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A). The case remains referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge for pretrial proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Unknown

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 8, 2022
2:19-cv-10502-GW (SK) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Williams v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT CURTIS WILLIAMS, III, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 8, 2022

Citations

2:19-cv-10502-GW (SK) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2022)