From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Stinnett

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Nov 3, 2021
3:20-cv-00098 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 3, 2021)

Opinion

3:20-cv-00098

11-03-2021

VERDELL WILLIAMS Plaintiff, v. DEION STINNETT Defendant.


ORDER

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Magistrate Judge has entered a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 11), recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), and for failure to effect service as required by Rule 4(m). No. objections have been filed.

Having considered the matter de novo as required by Rule 72, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 11) is ACCEPTED and APPROVED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Stinnett

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Nov 3, 2021
3:20-cv-00098 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Williams v. Stinnett

Case Details

Full title:VERDELL WILLIAMS Plaintiff, v. DEION STINNETT Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Nov 3, 2021

Citations

3:20-cv-00098 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 3, 2021)