From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Feb 7, 2005
No. 05-05-00079-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 7, 2005)

Opinion

No. 05-05-00079-CR

Opinion issued February 7, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F99-73251-NQ. Dismissed.

Before Justices MORRIS, WHITTINGTON, and O'NEILL.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Stacey Oneal Williams was convicted on his guilty plea of theft of property valued at $1500 or more but less than $20,000 and true to two enhancement paragraphs. On original appeal, this Court reversed the trial court's judgment and remanded for a new punishment hearing. See Williams v. State, No. 05-01-00105-CR (Tex.App.-Dallas Feb. 1, 2002, pet. ref'd). On remand, appellant and the State entered a plea bargain agreement for punishment. Pursuant to the agreement, the trial judge assessed punishment at 180 days' confinement in a state jail facility and a $1000 fine. Appellant also waived his right to appeal as part of the plea agreement. See Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000). The trial court's rule 25.2(d) certification states that appellant has no right to appeal, and the certification is supported by the documents before the Court. See Tex.R.App.P. 25.2(d); Dears v. State, No. PD-1963-03, 2005 WL 156736 (Tex.Crim.App. Jan. 26, 2005). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Feb 7, 2005
No. 05-05-00079-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 7, 2005)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:STACEY ONEAL WILLIAMS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Feb 7, 2005

Citations

No. 05-05-00079-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 7, 2005)