From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jan 16, 2001
36 S.W.3d 409 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 77643

January 16, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF SHELBY HONORABLE RONALD M. BELT.

Daniel L. Mohs, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON, Andrea Mazza Follett, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, Sr., P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.



ORDER


Tinya Williams ("Movant") appeals the trial court's judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum, for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jan 16, 2001
36 S.W.3d 409 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:TINYA WILLIAMS, Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Jan 16, 2001

Citations

36 S.W.3d 409 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)