From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 13, 1925
272 S.W. 783 (Tex. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

No. 9052.

Delivered May 13, 1925.

Burglary — Companion Case.

This is a companion case to Skirlock, v. State, No. 9043, this day decided. The Skirlock case was reversed because of the unwarranted argument of the district attorney, and the same error being presented in the instant case, a reversal is ordered herein.

Appeal from the District Court of Jones County. Tried below before the Hon. Bruce W. Bryant, Judge.

Appeal from a conviction of burglary; penalty, two years in the penitentiary.

Lon A. Brooks, for appellant.

Tom Garrard, State's Attorney, and Grover C. Morris, Assistant State's Attorney, for the State.


Appellant was convicted in the district court of Jones County for the offense of burglary and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years.

This is a companion to the case of Skirlock v. State, No. 9043, this day decided. The identical argument on which the judgment in the Skirlock case was reversed, was made by the district attorney in this case, under facts in no manner unlike those in the Skirlock case. Under the authority of that case, it follows that reversible error was committed by State's counsel in making the argument complained of.

It is therefore the order of this court that this case should be reversed and remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 13, 1925
272 S.W. 783 (Tex. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:A. C. WILLIAMS v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: May 13, 1925

Citations

272 S.W. 783 (Tex. Crim. App. 1925)
272 S.W. 783

Citing Cases

Weatherred v. State

These facts clearly differentiate this case from all those cited in appellant's original brief and in support…

Brown v. State

The exact point is again presented here. The inquiry of appellant and the argument based upon his silence…