From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Mar 9, 2004
129 S.W.3d 428 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. ED 82576

March 9, 2004

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Madison County, Honorable Sandy Martinez.

Maleaner Harvey, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. Nixon, Charnette D. Douglass, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Clifford H. Ahrens, P.J., William H. Crandall, Jr., J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.



ORDER


Seneca Williams appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He alleged his plea counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to interview two exculpatory witnesses.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Mar 9, 2004
129 S.W.3d 428 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:SENECA WILLIAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Mar 9, 2004

Citations

129 S.W.3d 428 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)