From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 17, 1954
284 App. Div. 1027 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Opinion

November 17, 1954.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Vaughan, Piper, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ. [ 204 Misc. 843.]


Judgment affirmed, with costs.


We think the finding of the Court of Claims that the State was negligent is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. Further we find no competent evidence in this record that Kennedy "by use of force, threats and duress, compelled" decedent Williams "to drive and transport said William A. Kennedy in attempting to perfect his escape." In any event we think that the rule laid down in Mitchell v. Rochester Ry. Co. ( 151 N.Y. 107), that plaintiff cannot recover for injuries occasioned by fright when there is no physical injury, is applicable here. We do not construe Comstock v. Wilson ( 257 N.Y. 231) as having changed the rule. On this record the judgment should be reversed and the claim dismissed. (Appeal from a judgment for claimant on a claim against the State for damages for the death of claimant's testator and for conscious pain and suffering.)


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 17, 1954
284 App. Div. 1027 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:BESSIE D. WILLIAMS, as Executrix of ALBERT WILLIAMS, Deceased, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 17, 1954

Citations

284 App. Div. 1027 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Citing Cases

Spangberg v. Eastern Air Lines, Incorporated

Although the Mitchell case has elsewhere been frequently criticized, its doctrine has never been repudiated…