From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 22, 2005
908 So. 2d 519 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 4D03-4716.

June 29, 2005. Rehearing Denied August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Kenneth D. Stern, Judge; L.T. Case No. 98-1616 CFA02.

Ronald Chapman, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Laurel R. Wiley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm the order denying appellant's motion for postconviction relief based upon the ground that counsel was ineffective for failing to convey a plea offer. The trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing on the matter, based upon our direction in Williams v. State, 837 So.2d 1084 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). To establish that counsel was ineffective for failing to convey a plea offer, the defendant must show that: (1) counsel failed to communicate a plea offer or incorrectly advised defendant regarding the possible penalties; (2) the defendant would have accepted the plea offer but for the inadequate communication; and (3) acceptance of the plea offer would have resulted in a lesser sentence. Cottle v. State, 733 So.2d 963, 967 (Fla. 1999). After hearing the evidence and making credibility determinations, the trial court found that defense counsel conveyed any plea offers, and appellant adamantly rejected such offers because he claimed he was not guilty.

Affirmed.

STONE, WARNER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 22, 2005
908 So. 2d 519 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Phillip E. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 22, 2005

Citations

908 So. 2d 519 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)