From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 13, 1971
461 S.W.2d 630 (Tex. Crim. App. 1971)

Opinion

No. 43601.

January 13, 1971.

Appeal from the 12th Judicial District Court, Ernest Coker, J.

Harry H. Walsh, Huntsville, for petitioner.

James F. Warren, Dist. Atty., Navasota, and Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


OPINION


The petitioner, an inmate of the Texas Department of Corrections seeks discharge from confinement under conviction for theft from the person in Cause No. 10,437 in the District Court of Walker County on May 28, 1957.

The Honorable Ernest Coker, Judge of the 12th Judicial District, held a hearing and on August 30, 1970, filed his findings of fact and conclusions of law and certified the same to this Court. We have examined the record and find that his conclusions are supported.

He found that petitioner was not represented by counsel; that he was indigent; that he was not offered counsel, and did not waive the right to counsel. He concluded that such conviction was void and we agree. Ex parte Auten, Tex.Cr.App., 458 S.W.2d 466.

Petitioner is ordered discharged from confinement under such conviction.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 13, 1971
461 S.W.2d 630 (Tex. Crim. App. 1971)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:R. G. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jan 13, 1971

Citations

461 S.W.2d 630 (Tex. Crim. App. 1971)

Citing Cases

Ex Parte King

The record before us supports his contention. The failure to appoint counsel violated his Fourteenth and…

Ex parte Bain

See and cf. Smith v. State, 513 S.W.2d 586 (Tex.Cr.App. 1974). Under such circumstances, the trial court…