From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 1, 1991
580 So. 2d 624 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-2679.

March 1, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County, Frank Bell, J.

Brian Tullis Williams, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.


This is an appeal from the trial court's summary denial of appellant's motion to vacate and set aside an illegal sentence. Appellant's motion for post-conviction relief is insufficient, in that it is not under oath as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and it fails to include the information required by subsections (b), (c), and (d) of the rule.

Accordingly, we affirm the denial of appellant's motion, but such denial is without prejudice to the filing of a proper motion in accordance with the requirements of the rule.

JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., and CAWTHON, Senior Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 1, 1991
580 So. 2d 624 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN TULLIS WILLIAMS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 1, 1991

Citations

580 So. 2d 624 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. State

We agree, however, that the trial court's order of dismissal should have been with leave to file an amended…

Black v. State

Although the court correctly noted that the ineffective assistance claim could be refuted by appellant's…