From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 15, 1959
113 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 1959)

Opinion

July 15, 1959.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Osceola County, Frank A. Smith, J.

Sam E. Murrell Sons, Orlando, for petitioner.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Edward S. Jaffry, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.


Because of a palpable and egregious violation of Florida Appellate Rule 3.14, subd. b, 31 F.S.A. providing that petitions for rehearing "must set forth concisely, and without argument, the alleged omissions, oversights, causes or grounds on which it is based" and pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.14, subd. d providing for the striking of such petition for a substantial violation of any material provision of the rule,

It Is Ordered that said petition be and the same is hereby stricken.

TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, and HOBSON, DREW, THORNAL and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 15, 1959
113 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 1959)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:TED WILLIAMS, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 15, 1959

Citations

113 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 1959)

Citing Cases

Petition of Post-Newsweek Stations, Florida

Because of a palpable violation of Florida Appellate Rule 3.14 b. providing that petitions for rehearing…

Dayton v. State

See concurring opinion on Petition for Rehearing in Petition of Post-Newsweek Stations, Florida, Inc., 359…