From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 27, 2007
958 So. 2d 480 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 5D06-1919.

May 18, 2007. Rehearing Denied June 27, 2007.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County, Frank N. Kaney, Senior Judge.

Daniel D. Mazar, of Mead Mazar, Winter Park, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carlos A. Ivanor, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Having carefully considered the challenges raised by the defendant to his conviction and sentence for possession of cannabis with intent to sell or deliver, we find no reversible error. We write to point out that even though the detention of the defendant may have been illegal, the inevitable discovery doctrine applies and the cannabis found pursuant to the drug dog alert on his inoperative motor vehicle would have inevitably been discovered in the course of the otherwise legitimate investigation. See Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 104 S.Ct. 2501, 81 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984); Moody v. State, 842 So.2d 754 (Fla. 2003); Hatcher v. State, 834 So.2d 314 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); State v. Walton, 565 So.2d 381 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

AFFIRMED.

PLEUS, C.J., ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 27, 2007
958 So. 2d 480 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Johnnie WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 27, 2007

Citations

958 So. 2d 480 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Florida

Johnnie WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.Case below, 958 So.2d 480. Petition for writ of certiorari to the…