From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 8, 1992
591 So. 2d 329 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-01146.

January 8, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; William J. Nelson, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Andrea Norgard, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Erica M. Raffel, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Tracy T. Williams appeals his convictions and sentences for burglary and grand theft. We affirm the convictions but remand to conform the written order to the oral pronouncements made at sentencing.

The trial court's oral pronouncements at sentencing imposed a four-year prison term for burglary followed by concurrent terms of four years' probation on each of two counts of grand theft. Nevertheless, the written sentence reflects concurrent terms of four years' prison on all three counts followed by four years' probation on count II, grand theft. We remand to conform the written sentence to the oral pronouncements and to determine credit for time served on the grand theft sentences. See Oliver v. State, 556 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Affirmed and remanded.

FRANK, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 8, 1992
591 So. 2d 329 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:TRACY T. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 8, 1992

Citations

591 So. 2d 329 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Stark v. State

The case must, therefore, be remanded to conform the written sentences to the trial court's oral…

Murph v. State

This court must remand the case for the trial court to conform the written sentence to the oral…