From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 3, 2002
841 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Nos. 5D01-1171, 5D01-1172.

March 22, 2002. Rehearing Denied May 3, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Anthony H. Johnson, Judge.

R. Spencer Rhodes, Orlando, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


AFFIRMED.

PLEUS and PALMER, JJ., concur.

SAWAYA, J., dissents with opinion.


I respectfully dissent. In my view, the affidavit executed in connection with the search warrant did not establish probable cause. Therefore, the trial court erred in denying the Defendant's motion to suppress the photographs found inside the vehicle pursuant to the illegal search. Moreover, I do not believe that the testimony of the witnesses who were identified from the photographs is sufficiently attenuated from the taint of the illegal search to be admissible. Given the fact that the issue raised in the motion to suppress was found to be dispositive by the trial court when the Defendant entered his plea, and given the stipulation by the prosecutor that the State would not be able to prove its case without the photographs, I would reverse the judgment of conviction and the sentence.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 3, 2002
841 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:RANDALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 3, 2002

Citations

841 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)